CUAFA 2024 Community Survey Summary

Introduction

In 2024, the Columbia University Asian Faculty Association surveyed its membership about work satisfaction, belonging, work–life balance, and well-being. A total of 105 faculty responded — 42 from CUIMC, 24 from Arts & Sciences, and 11 from SEAS, with the remainder spread across other schools. Respondents were 52.9% female and 47.1% male, and roughly 80% were U.S. citizens.

The survey was conducted under the leadership of then-CUAFA president Yiping Han, with contributions from Executive Committee members Qin Gao, Anette Wu, and Tian Zheng, along with their students.

Two findings sit at the center of the results. Since CUAFA’s inauguration in 2020, Asian faculty report a stronger sense of belonging — both within their own academic units and at the university level. AAPI faculty remain concerned about their underrepresentation in leadership roles, and report that AAPI concerns receive limited attention, with few dedicated institutional responses to anti-Asian hate.

Figure 1 — Who responded

Age distribution of the 105 respondents. The sample spans six decades of academic career stage, from early-career faculty to emeritus colleagues.

Histogram of respondent ages, ranging from 28 to 88, with the largest concentration of respondents in their late thirties through fifties.

Figure 2 — Belonging has improved since 2020

Agreement with statements about Asian faculty belonging and representation. Belonging has moved. Representation and visibility have not.

Figure 3 — Satisfaction, category by category

Satisfaction levels by category.

Stacked bar chart of satisfaction levels across categories including salary, benefits, academic support, mentoring, promotion, and workload, showing which aspects of faculty work draw the most and least satisfaction.

Figure 4 — What actually drives satisfaction

Salary, academic support, and benefits show the strongest positive impact on overall work satisfaction.

Chart showing the relative contribution of different workplace factors to overall work satisfaction, with salary, academic support, and benefits showing the strongest positive associations.

Figure 5 — Work–life balance

Figure 6 — Well-being and support

Caregiving and household responsibilities carried by respondents.

Bar chart showing the percentage of faculty respondents carrying various caregiving and household responsibilities, including most daily household duties, an elderly parent, a minor dependent, a child under five, a child preparing for college, and a

Figure 7 — Female faculty report more stress

Emotional stress by gender. Female faculty reported higher stress than their male counterparts across the measure.

Chart comparing emotional stress responses between male and female faculty, showing consistently higher reported stress among female respondents.
Next
Next

Anil K. Lalwani Appointed as the inaugural Dean of the Gangwal School of Medical Sciences & Technology at the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur.